• LATEST NEWS
  • INDIA
  • WORLD
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • LIFESTYLE
  • BUSINESS
  • EDUCATION
  • CRICKET
  • TECH
  • SPORTS
  • AUTO
  • SPIRITUAL
  • Fashion
  • HOROSCOPE
  • PHOTO STORIES
  • WEATHER
  • CALCULATORS
  • BRANDVERSE
  • FLASH
  • Videos
  • Cric Daily
  • Astro Daily
  • Flash
  • Search
  • In Focus
  • Tata Sons Chairman Row
  • PM Modi 76th Birthday
  • Rise And Fall 2
  • New UPI Charges
  • Mutual Funds Mastery
  • AI Bootcamp
  • Opinion
  • Smart Guide
  • Jagran Reviews
  • Home
  • Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court Quashes Lifetime Pension Cut Of Retired Engineer; Orders Release Of Full Benefits

The Jharkhand High Court has quashed a state government order imposing a lifelong 10 per cent cut on the pension of retired Assistant Engineer Shyam Nath Dubey. The court found that the principles of natural justice had been violated in the departmental proceedings, as the charges were based solely on enclosed documents and no witnesses were presented. 

Author: Kamakshi Bishnoi
Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:39 PM (IST)
Source:Jagran News Network
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Lifetime Pension Cut Of Retired Engineer; Orders Release Of Full Benefits
The Jharkhand High Court has quashed a state government order imposing a lifelong 10 per cent cut on the pension of retired Assistant Engineer Shyam Nath Dubey.

In a significant ruling, the Jharkhand High Court has set aside disciplinary action taken against a government employee after his retirement, holding that the proceedings violated the principles of natural justice. Justice Anand Sen quashed the Jharkhand government’s order imposing a lifelong 10 per cent cut in pension on retired Assistant Engineer Shyam Nath Dubey.

Dubey, who served in the Water Resources Department, retired on June 30, 2013. Departmental proceedings were initiated against him after his retirement, and following an inquiry into five charges, an order dated July 21, 2015, imposed a permanent 10 per cent deduction from his pension. His departmental appeal was rejected on February 18, 2021, prompting him to approach the High Court.

ALSO READ: Ghaziabad Awas Vikas Clears Encroachment On 3,000 Sqm Land In Sector-4; FIR Filed Against Encroachers

While hearing the petition, the court observed that merely annexing documents with a charge sheet does not amount to proving the charges. It held that documents must be legally proved before the inquiry officer, which may require the examination of witnesses. In the present case, the state admitted that the charges were held to be proved solely based on documents attached to the charge sheet and that no witnesses were examined.

The court termed this a clear violation of the principles of natural justice and cited a Supreme Court ruling, which states that charges cannot be treated as proved unless the supporting documents are duly validated in accordance with the law.

ALSO READ: BMC Results: Congress-Uddhav Sena Vote Split Helped Mahayuti In 32 Seats; Did Oppn Miss The Trick | Explained

Consequently, the High Court quashed both the punitive order dated July 21, 2015, and the order rejecting Dubey’s appeal dated February 18, 2021. The state government has been directed to release all consequential benefits to the petitioner, including gratuity, leave encashment, and full pension, at the earliest.

Join our WhatsApp Channel
Copyright © 2026 Jagran Prakashan Limited.All rights reserved.
For any feedback or complaint,
email to compliant_gro@jagrannewmedia.com
This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.